For more information email us on:


Twitter1 Jul Back in April, Andrew Orriss, of the STA, presented at the @NHBC ‘Building for tomorrow’ events to discuss structur… Jun The use of timber in construction is growing due to the sustainability of the material as the only truly renewable… Jun Matt Hoad, Technical Director at HTA, explores the benefits of designing with wood, and how architects and develope… Jun The STA has been invited to participate in the Timber in Construction Working Group, which brings together key indu…

Work Packages

Below is an outline of the work packages to provide an appreciation of the body of work undertaken. By registering your interest you will gain access to all information and outputs from each of those work packages.



WP1 has resulted in the publication of: “Structural Timber Association, 2020. Structural timber buildings fire safety in use guidance. Volume 6 – Mass timber structures; Building Regulation compliance B3(1), V1.1. ed. STA”.

This sets out support to designers in establishing the most appropriate route to demonstrating adequate structural performance in the event of fire, with an emphasis on the English regulatory framework. It seeks to clarify the structural fire performance objectives that must be satisfied to meet Regulation B3(1), having due regard to a building’s height, use and consequences of failure. By using consequence classes (as defined in Approved Document A) to differentiate performance expectations, the publication gives recommendations as to when the guidance in, for example, Approved Document B (ADB) can apply and when it does not. It also sets out what evidence the designer should produce when guidance such as ADB is considered not to be applicable as a means of demonstrating compliance with Regulation B3(1), e.g., such as showing that the structure can survive the burn-out of the compartment fuel content and subsequently self-extinguish.


Fig. Outputs from WP1

Work package 2 – Training and dissemination

WP2 has delivered a series of webinars to industry stakeholders outlining the progress made in respect of WP1. A recording is available via: Further webinars will be held in the future to share the findings of other work packages and to reinforce / promote the use of Vol. 6 of the STA guidance.

Work package 3 – Large-scale experiments literature review

WP3 has documented the state of the art with regards large-scale fire experimentation and mass timber construction based upon the literature available at the time. The outcome is a freely available literature review report available to download from the SIG information library accessed from this page.

Work package 3a – Small-scale experiments

WP3a has been instigated in response to the literature review and in considering how best to generalise the outcomes of large-scale experiments intended under WP5 and WP6, in cognisance of the potential differences in fire performance of CLT between suppliers. WP3a concerns a suite of small-scale radiant panel experiments (sample size 200 x 200 mm x 120 mm thick) undertaken by Efectis to assess impact of:

  • Wall and ceiling orientation;
  • Supplier;
  • Lamella thickness (40 mm vs. 20 mm);
  • Whether edge-glued vs. not; and
  • Adhesive type (heat-resistant vs. regular polyurethane adhesive).

The fire performance across these variables is considered in terms of: heat release rate, sample mass loss rate and in-depth temperature profile. These parameters are measured over a 60 min duration, subject to an incident heat flux of 50 kW/m2.


Fig. WP3a outcome on the comparability of CLT HRR for different first lamella thicknesses.

Work package 4 – Encapsulation-based route to compliance

WP4 has been developed to set out a model fire strategy for a high-rise residential building (HRRB) formed of mass timber and falling within the scope of the in-effect ban enacted through the changes to Regulation 7 of the English Building Regulations. It sets out key considerations in terms of: encapsulation specification, fire stopping, the interface between a non-combustible external wall and CLT internal members, etc. Finally, the deliverable aims to map available test data for encapsulation solutions, fire stopping details, etc., to identify knowledge gaps where further standard (compliance) testing may be valuable.

Work package 5 – HRRB large-scale experiments

WP5 builds upon WP4 and acknowledges that fully encapsulated mass timber buildings may not be viable from a commercial perspective, i.e., there is an anticipated desire to optimise the extent and volume of protective lining used to internal CLT surfaces. In this regard, up to nine compartment experiments of the scale of 3 m x 4 m x 2.4 m high are planned, utilising a combination of heat resistant and non-resistant adhesive CLT (informed by WP3a). These will be protected to varying extents with plasterboard to establish to what degree linings can be allowed to fail within a protected CLT compartment and how early in the development of a fire this can occur, whilst still observing self-extinction. This will serve to inform the scope to which linings in a HRRB context can be optimised, whilst still ensuring a building has a reasonable likelihood of surviving burn-out.


Fig. Illustrative HRRB experiment compartment with fully encapsulated walls and partially protected ceiling.

Work package 6 – Commercial large-scale experiments

WP6 comprises three large-scale enclosure experiments conducted in collaboration with ITB, Poland. The enclosures are intended to replicate a commercial office-type environment and measure 3.75 m x 7.5 m x 2.5 m high, with one fully open side. A localised fire will be generated via propane burners which will induce flames extending across c. 50% of the ceiling in the 7.5 m direction.

The experiments primarily serve to answer if avoiding delamination is a prerequisite for confidence in self-extinction of flaming combustion, when only a CLT ceiling is exposed.

The three experiments comprise:

1. A reference experiment with a fully encapsulated CLT ceiling to characterise the conditions below a non-combustible ceiling;

2. An exposed CLT ceiling adopting a regular polyurethane non-heat-resistant adhesive (informed by WP3a) to characterise both the change in the conditions below a combustible ceiling (relative to the reference experiment) and the self-extinction behaviour of the ceiling, with increasing extents of delamination depending upon the distance from the burner;

3. An exposed CLT ceiling adopting a heat-resistant adhesive (informed by WP3a). This will serve to provide a comparison of the development of the conditions below a combustible ceiling where delamination is less likely. It will also serve to provide a comparison in the self-extinction characteristics of the CLT slab for a case less susceptible to delamination versus experiment 2, where it is more likely.

Instrumentation will be provided in all three experiments to make estimations of the slab mass loss rate, heat flux from the flames at the CLT surface, heat flux in advance of the fire front and emanating from the ceiling jet, etc.

Whilst the enclosures are relatively modest, the use of a propane burner is intended to mimic the behaviour of a localised or travelling fire in a larger space.


Fig. Illustrative commercial enclosure elevation

In Association With:



logo_bandk logo_eurban